Posted today on her latest fake review:
A very fast start for Hattie in 2012, 67 fake reviews just today!
And, after a very slow month of December for the Fraud Known as HK, (157 fake reviews in a month is slow for Hattie anyway) here is the year of 2011 for your viewing pleasure:
185 fraudulent reviews in Jan 2011 5.97 per day 5.97 YTD 5.79 Overall 23678 Reviews to date
229 fraudulent reviews in Feb 2011 8.18 per day 7.07 YTD 5.81 Overall 23907 Reviews to date
204 fraudulent reviews in Mar 2011 6.58 per day 6.91 YTD 5.81 Overall 24111 Reviews to date
306 fraudulent reviews in Apr 2011 10.20 per day 7.73 YTD 5.84 Overall 24417 Reviews to date
171 fraudulent reviews in May 2011 5.52 per day 7.29 YTD 5.84 Overall 24588 Reviews to date
219 fraudulent reviews in Jun 2011 7.30 per day 7.29 YTD 5.85 Overall 24807 Reviews to date
218 fraudulent reviews in Jul 2011 7.03 per day 7.25 YTD 5.86 Overall 25025 Reviews to date
289 fraudulent reviews in Aug 2011 9.32 per day 7.51 YTD 5.89 Overall 25314 Reviews to date
230 fraudulent reviews in Sep 2011 7.67 per day 7.53 YTD 5.90 Overall 25544 Reviews to date
210 fraudulent reviews in Oct 2011 6.77 per day 7.45 YTD 5.90 Overall 25754 Reviews to date
215 fraudulent reviews in Nov 2011 7.17 per day 7.43 YTD 5.91 Overall 25969 Reviews to date
157 fraudulent reviews in Dec 2011 5.06 per day 7.23 YTD 5.91 Overall 26126 Reviews to date
I found some more interesting facts on Our Lady of Perpetual Posting, originally posted by (and many thanks to) Brian A. Roush. As stated by Brian, these stats are not 100% accurate, but are more accurate that any of Fraud HK's fake reviews:
Top 10 postings of fake reviews in a day:
140 31-Oct-04
125 3-Sep-08
116 4-Nov-08
114 2-Apr-08
114 6-Mar-08
113 2-Jul-03
112 7-Aug-08
108 3-Feb-09
102 2-Aug-06
101 18-Jan-03
101 5-Jul-06
66 Vine Reviews
312 AVP Reviews
Reviews by Year / Per Month / Per Day / Up-Down
1999 85
2000 1204 100.33 3.30
2001 1467 122.25 4.02 0.72
2002 1395 116.25 3.82 -0.20
2003 2063 171.91 5.65 1.83
2004 2140 178.33 5.86 0.21
2005 2092 174.33 5.73 -0.13
2006 2535 211.25 6.95 1.21
2007 2458 204.83 6.73 -0.21
2008 2481 206.75 6.80 0.06
2009 2849 237.41 7.81 1.01
2010 2727 227.25 7.47 -0.33
2011 2570 214.16 7.04 -0.43
Reviews by Star Rating: 99.7 percent of Fraud HK Reviews are 4 or 5 stars
1 0 0.000 Only 82 with a * rating if 3 or below
2 3 0.000 None of them were 1 *
3 79 0.003
4 8938 0.343
5 17030 0.654
26050
Helpfulness:
Star Rating / Helpful Votes / Total Votes / % Helpful
2 11 12 92%
3 315 483 65%
4 25719 36750 70%
5 73408 98438 75%
Tot 99453 135683 73%
Helpfulness by year: Helpful-Total-% Helpful-Reviews-Votes per Review
1999 1237 1361 90.9% 85 16.01
2000 11984 13822 86.7% 1204 11.48
2001 8057 10044 80.2% 1467 6.85
2002 5730 7345 78.0% 1395 5.27
2003 8575 11114 77.2% 2063 5.39
2004 10071 13483 74.7% 2140 6.30
2005 9025 12046 74.9% 2092 5.76
2006 8696 12455 69.8% 2535 4.91
2007 7828 12548 62.4% 2458 5.10
2008 8804 13565 64.9% 2481 5.47
2009 6915 9905 69.8% 2849 3.48
2010 7043 9867 71.4% 2727 3.62
2011 5488 8128 67.5% 2570 3.16
In case you missed it, she posted 140 fake reviews on October 31st, 2004. Yes, 140, in one day, that's 6 books per hour or, 1 book every 10 minutes, supposedly read and a fake review posted for it.
Hattie, you started this fiasco of creating fake reviews of books you did not read on 9/21/1999, that's 12 plus years of fraud.
Disclaimer: The date of 9/21/1999 is the date of the first fake review recorded under her name. Fraud HK actually started posting fake reviews on Amazon long before that date but there is no easy way to track them as they all look to be recorded under "A Customer". You can find some of them if you look hard enough. And, since she can put out 1000 fake reviews in just a few months, the estimate is 3500-5000 fake reviews prior to 9/21/1999.
Ok, I'm done for now, I'll report back again next month with a recap of January, again, 67 just today, with a start like this, we could have another 300+ month.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Awesome, man. Great job, thanks. Let's see if she keeps up that productivity.
Post a Comment