The Harriet Klausner Appreciation Society: Priceless

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Stephanie said...: It's actually 363 of 364.

Seriously, it is so obviously fixed! Do these people really sit around all day and post positive votes on certain peoples comments and reviews?!; July 18, 2007 at 1:13 AM
Stephanie said...: Is she the female version of Grady? All of her reviews ( all 13 of them ) have 393 out of 394 or 416 out of 416 helpful votes. FRAUDULENT!; July 18, 2007 at 1:15 AM
Malleus said...: I swear it wasn't me :-) (who cast this extra vote).

MK discovered this marvel of a reviewer a while ago: I just thought it's cute how she augmented in the Comments section about her own review right above that 'This review is an extremely accurate assessment' -- and that three hundred and sixty-two people found this commentary helpful and adding to the discussion.

These cretins probably think that we, The Reading Public, are so fucking stupid that we'll just gobble up this nonsense wholesale. Just as revolting is the fact that, apparently, this baldfaced absurd farce is just fine with Amazon.; July 18, 2007 at 1:31 AM
Barbara Delaney said...: What's really sad is that she wrote that review on Christmas day. Ouch. I guess none of her four hundred "friends" could spend the day with her in the flesh. A rather pathetic way to spend a holiday...; July 21, 2007 at 9:39 PM
Malleus said...: Hopefully she's seen the error of her ways since: the page's been inactive for a long time.; July 23, 2007 at 3:52 PM

The Harriet Klausner Appreciation Society