In Part 1, we examined Klausner's known work history and some of the
requirements for earning a bachelors and masters degree in Library Sciences.
In Part 11, we looked at Klausner’s punctuation,
grammar, and spelling errors; pronouns, nouns, adjectives, adverbs,
redundancies, singulars and plurals, verb tenses; prepositions, possessives,
and the weird and wacky.
This section investigates Klausner’s math and
logic skills. How do we do that? Again, it’s very easy.
Numbers are the most logical and purest form of communication that we
have. They are absolute and are the foundation of science. In the first
grade, children are taught to add simple numbers like 1 + 1. By the
fourth grade, we have learned subtraction, multiplication, and division.
How do we apply this information to Klausner’s
reviews and profiles? We just look at the numbers she uses.
•
|
On Amazon, she says that she
reads 2 books per day.
|
•
|
On Book Crossing.com she
says she reads 2-3 books per day.
|
•
|
In Time Magazine, she is
quoted as reading 4-6 books per day.
|
•
|
Wired Online Magazine
reports Klausner as writing 2 reviews per day.
|
•
|
On All Readers.com she says
she reviews 3-4 books per day.
|
•
|
On Amazon, her review
average is 7 books per day.
|
Nothing quite adds up in those statements.
Now let’s go look inside her reviews. What
do we find there? Let’s start with basic
addition:
Harriet says that Holt, Max, and Mira are
a quartet.
|
|
Harriet says
that "three girls begin singing".
They are: Penn, Thea, Arista,
and Alexi.
|
|
Harriet
characterizes Amalie, Oliver, Michael, Eve, Shane, Claire, and at least two
vampires as “the Glass House quartet”.
|
|
|
Burke and Sergeant Moore,
Clayton Manning, Tesla protégé, and Professor Dan Richards.
|
How does one graduate from the first grade without being able to count to
8?
Here, an author says that Harriet got the number of pack members in her book
wrong. Harriet said there were 13 pack
members. Apparently, there weren’t.
Now we make the easy transition to logic.
Logic, in some way, means making order out of chaos. But it appears that we have someone who brings
chaos out of order.
Inexplicably, we have the placement of the years 1886 and 1896 in the 1990s. This novel, according to Harriet’s
review begins in 1886;
yet she concludes her review by stating that it occurs in the last decade of the
1900s (“the twentieth century”).
Harriet places 1922 after the end of World War II (1945, 1951, or 1955, depending on which event historians cite).
In another review, Harriet mentions the “1500s”, “the 1940s” and “1949”, but says the book addresses questions from the 1930s and 1912.
Numbers are a beautiful thing!
Continue to Section V, "What's Ethics Got to Do With It?"
No comments:
Post a Comment