Sometime later, I got curious
about what else Harriet has said that might be untrue. I began to think
about her Masters in Library Science. But why would that be the thing
that kept raising its head?
With the exception of a
profile that says she was born and raised in Europe, Harriet’s profiles reveal
that she held only two librarian positions, both for short periods of time—one
in Pennsylvania and one in Georgia. She provides approximate time periods
for that employment as well as working part-time and and/or full-time at used
bookstores in those locations. Immediately, I wondered: Why would a
person who has a Masters in Library Science work in a used
bookstore? Who spends that much time, effort, and money obtaining
such an advanced degree only to squander it as a clerk in a bookstore? I
don't know the answer, but I sure do have the question.
Library Sciences is an English
and math intensive field. It’s a customer service oriented
discipline. At its heart are logic, communication, and organization of
information. Within its core competencies are ethics; values; human
communication; intellectual property laws; and effective verbal and written
communication techniques, principles, and methods of advocacy used to promote
and explain concepts and services.
Naturally, to enter a masters
program, one must first have graduated from an accredited bachelors program by
completing the appropriate coursework. There are many different kinds of
classes required, but within them can frequently be found coursework with on
reading and cognition, information literacy, technique of storytelling, and
ethics. The curriculum is typically described as reading and writing
intensive.
Does Harriet demonstrate the
requisite communication skills, reading skills, and writing skills? Does
she have a practice of ethics. Does she have a firm grasp on simple math?
Well, it’s not a far jump from
there to examine her reviews for the answers. Let’s take a look at what
they tell us: (1) Her punctuation, grammar, and spelling skills are substandard. (2) She misrepresents the books she reads. (3) She
is practically incapable of writing a coherent sentence. (4) She is mathematically challenged. (5) She is ethically challenged.
How does a person earn a
masters degree when they don’t have the math skills needed by a second grader
(e.g., 1 + 1 = 3), when they don’t have the basic English skill set required to
graduate from middle school, when they don’t display the kind of ethics as
required by the field, and when they disregard intellectual property law in
spite of the their training?
Whatever the answer is, I
surely hope it isn’t a reflection on the efficacy of our educational system.
In several
subsequent parts to this article, each one of the above areas will be
addressed, along with references. Some of the source materials and
examples are so extensive that it is apparent the problems are widespread and
not isolated.
PartIIA: CPR Needed for the English Language
Part
IIB: Plurals and Singulars, Verb Tenses, and Redundancies
Part
IIC: A Mess of Nouns, Pronouns, Adjectives, Adverbs, Verbs,
and Possessives
PartIID: Prepositions, "Ases", and Weird and
Wacky
Part
III: Killing Me Softly With Your Review
Part
IV: Harriet’s Mad Math and Logic Skills
Part V: What's Ethics Got to Do With It?
4 comments:
I'm in awe of all of your recent work Embee, GREAT JOB!
Embee, WOW! Stupendous work! I enjoyed reading it! It's so intriguing and wonderfully written!
I will echo Buck and Sara. Embee, you put a lot of work into this. And you really managed to highlight something about Harriet that I think a lot of people don't get: it's not JUST a little error here or there (which might be excusable as a typo or an obscure rule someone doesn't know). It's NUMEROUS errors in nearly every aspect of written English.
Amazing sleuthing Embee! Thanks!
Post a Comment